uncategorized


This entry has been sitting here in draft form since last fall. I haul it out every once in a while, revise it a little, then put it back in draft form. But tonight at the regional Title One conference, there was discussion about student bloggers that made this particular post again come to the forefront for me. Now I can’t stop thinking about it – which must mean it’s time to go public with it.

This year, in addition to Technocalities, I’ve maintained a personal blog. It started out as a place to post photos that I was trying to make myself take more of. But it quickly became a narrative of sorts – with a photo to accompany each entry. And two big surprises have come from it: I work harder at the writing part than I ever expected I would – and I actually look forward to doing it. How did that happen???

Usually I post late in the evening, just before the end of my day. Throughout the day, I think about an idea, a notion, the content of the day’s post. I find myself composing phrases at odd times. If I come up with something I really like, I often make a note to myself. I even started a running list of ideas about which to post – old stories and memories, things that are on my mind, that sort of thing. When I finally do sit down to blog, I have my dictionary application open so I can check spelling and reference the thesaurus. I compose the day’s post, then I reread and revise. Mull over my choices of words. Vary my sentence structure. Make sure the paragraph flows. Try to be concise but clear. I work hard on the ending trying for a big finish. When I think I’ve got it right, I publish – and then shut down for the night. But in the morning with coffee, after I’ve caught up on the news, after I’ve checked email and the weather, I read the post again. If it needs tweaking, I do it then. I find it helps in the revision process to have that little bit of distance from the original writing session.

Doesn’t this sound familiar??? Isn’t this precisely what we ask our kids to do when they write?

What is it that drives me to put so much effort into something as trivial as a photo blog? It’s because I know it’s being read. At this writing, I have a small audience. Very small, actually – but it’s an audience nonetheless. And, as I write, I am becoming more and more aware of the impact of my writing on this audience. I do believe I’m hooked. And I can not tell you how surprised I am by that.

So here’s my question: Could the same thing happen for kids who blog? Does it? Does their sense of audience drive them to work harder at writing than they ever thought they would? Might they find they actually like to write? I wonder.

Regarding the video I posted a few days ago…

YouTube, the site where the video is located, is blocked by the district filter. So you’ll have to view it at home, I guess. The link is here.

This video was produced and posted by an associate professor at Kansas State. It contains timely, thought-provoking content dealing with the future of the web. Isn’t it ironic that we can’t view it in our own schools?

asimov.jpgBorn today, Isaac Asimov (1920-1992) was a scientist, teacher, and writer. He must also have been a visionary – he wrote about computers and robots almost sixty years ago! Early in his career, he wrote science fiction and penned this short story for children for a newspaper in 1951. It was later published in Fantasy and Science Fiction Magazine. It’s a quick read – and it’s about education!

The Fun They Had
by Isaac Asimov

Margie even wrote about it that night in her diary. On the page headed 17 May, 2155, she wrote, ‘Today Tommy found a real book!’

It was a very old book. Margie’s grandfather once said that when he was a little boy his grandfather told him that there was a time when all stories were printed on paper.

They turned the pages, which were yellow and crinkly, and it was awfully funny to read words that stood still instead of moving the way they were supposed to— on a screen, you know. And then, when they turned back to the page before, it had the same words on it that it had had when they read it the first time.

‘Gee,’ said Tommy, ‘what a waste. When you’re through with the book, you just throw it away, I guess. Our television screen must have had a million books on it and it’s good for plenty more. I wouldn’t throw it away.’

‘Same with mine,’ said Margie. She was eleven and hadn’t seen as many telebooks as Tommy had. He was thirteen.

She said, ‘Where did you find it?’

‘In my house.’ He pointed without looking, because he was busy reading. ‘In the attic.’

‘What’s it about?’

‘School.’

Margie was scornful. ‘School? What’s there to write about school? I hate school.’ Margie always hated school, but now she hated it more than ever. The mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in geography and she had been doing worse and worse until her mother had shaken her head sorrowfully and sent for the County Inspector.

He was a round little man with a red face and a whole box of tools with dials and wires. He smiled at her and gave her an apple, then took the teacher apart. Margie had hoped he wouldn’t know how to put it together again, but he knew how all right and after an hour or so, there it was again, large and black and ugly with a big screen on which all the lessons were shown and the questions were asked. That wasn’t so bad. The part she hated most was the slot where she had to put homework and test papers. She always had to write them out in a punch code they made her learn when she was six years old, and the mechanical teacher calculated the mark in no time.

The Inspector had smiled after he was finished and patted her head. He said to her mother. ‘It’s not the little girl’s fault, Mrs Jones. I think the geography sector a s geared a little too quick. Those things happen sometimes. I’ve slowed it up to an average ten-year level. Actually, the overall pattern of her progress is quite satisfactory.’ And he patted Margie’s head again.
Margie was disappointed. She had been hoping they would take the teacher away altogether. They had once taken Tommy’s teacher away for nearly a month because the history sector had blanked out completely.

So she said to Tommy, ‘Why would anyone write about school?’

Tommy looked at her with very superior eyes. ‘Because it’s not our kind of school, stupid. This is the old kind of school that they had hundreds and hundreds of years ago.’ He added loftily, pronouncing the word carefully, ‘Centuries ago.’
Margie was hurt. ‘Well, I don’t know what kind of school they had all that time ago.’ She read the book over his shoulder for a while, then said, ‘Anyway, they had a teacher.’

‘Sure they had a teacher, but it wasn’t a regular teacher. It was a man.’

‘A man ? How could a man be a teacher?’

‘Well, he just told the boys and girls things and gave them homework and asked them questions.’

‘A man isn’t smart enough.’

‘Sure he is. My father knows as much as my teacher.’

‘He can’t. A man can’t know as much as a teacher.’

‘He knows almost as much I betcha.’

Margie wasn’t prepared to dispute that. She said. ‘I wouldn’t want a strange man in my house to teach me.’

Tommy screamed with laughter, ‘You don’t know much, Margie. The teachers didn’t live in the house. They had a special building and all the kids went there.’

‘And all the kids learned the same thing?’

‘Sure, if they were the same age.’

‘But my mother says a teacher has to be adjusted to fit the mind of each boy and girl it teaches and that each kid has to be taught differently.’

‘Just the same they didn’t do it that way tben. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to read the book.’

‘I didn’t say I didn’t like it,’ Margie said quickly. She wanted to read about those funny schools.

They weren’t even half finished when Margie’s mother called, ‘Margie! School!’

Margie looked up. ‘Not yet, mamma.’

‘Now: said Mrs. Jones. ‘And it’s probably time for Tommy, too.’

Margie said to Tommy, ‘Can I read the book some more with you after school?’

‘Maybe,’ he said, nonchalantly. He walked away whistling, the dusty old book tucked beneath his arm.

Margie went into the schoolroom. It was right next to her bedroom, and the mechanical teacher was on and waiting for her. It was always on at the same time every day except Saturday and Sunday, because her mother said little girls learned better if they learned at regular hours.

The screen was lit up, and it said: ‘Today’s arithmetic lesson is on the addition of proper fractions. Please insert yesterday’s homework in the proper slot.’

Margie did so with a sigh. She was thinking about the old schools they had when her grandfather’s grandfather was a little boy. All the kids from the whole neighbourhood came, laughing and shouting in the school-yard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things so they could help one another on the home-work and talk about it.

And the teachers were people…

The mechanical teacher was flashing on the screen: ‘When we add the fractions 1/2 and 1/4 —’

Margie was thinking about how the kids must have loved it in the old days. She was thinking about the fun they had.

(Thanks to Pete at EdTech Journeys for posting this on Christmas!)

A few hours ago, the Boston Red Sox organization presented their new right hander, Daisuke Matsuzaka, at a news conference at Fenway. As I watched the footage online, I had questions and wanted to know more. On the pages of Wikipedia, I quickly read about Matsuzaka’s high school experience, his early baseball career, the 2004 Olympics, and the recent details surrounding his acquisition by the Red Sox. There was even information about tonight’s press conference, right there on the pages of Wikipedia.

wiki400.jpg

The article is heavily footnoted with citations to content in the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, ESPN, Yahoo Sports and japanball.com. There are facts stated with requests in blue asking for someone to post the citation. There’s a disclaimer stating that the article is a current sports-related event and the content may change rapidly. The reader is made aware of possible discrepancies in the article.

Yes, Wikipedia can be written to by anyone. And yes, anyone can edit what’s there. But are there instances where that’s a postive rather than a negative? Are there times when Wikipedia is the best place to look for information?

Red Sox fans will no doubt monitor the article’s content and tweak it if needed. They’ll edit out misinformation if it appears. This is the beauty of Wikipedia – collective collaboration centered around a point of mutual interest to disseminate the facts. Can Encyclopedia Britannica do that?

David Weinberger and Deneen Frazier Bowen were the Wednesday and Thursday keynote speakers. Weinberger talked a lot about traditional knowledge and how it’s changing with the advance of web 2.0 tools like blogging, social bookmarking and wikipedia. See the previous post to access his presentation. Fraizer Bowen gave an amazing performance for her keynote presentation. It’s about forty minutes long – but its highly entertaining. Watch it and you’ll never think about kids and technology the same way again.

Reoccuring themes at the conference were blogging, podcasting, and other web 2.0 techniques. A resounding message: that these web 2.0 tools make it quicker and easier for individuals, our students included, to post content to the web. As a result, more and better critical thinking needs to be applied to that content by the viewer. Who created this? For what purpose? Is it credible? Why or why not? And how do we know?

Another focus was on building digital portfolios in compliance with the new ICT Literacy standards – which is in the works here in our district already.

Newfound representatives Blessing and Tripp presented their blogging project to approximately fifty participants on Wednesday. Again, the project was really well received. We’ve had many requests for our templates and rubrics.

Finally, running through most of the keynotes and the sessions was the message that schools need to be engaging and empowering kids with technology in a seamless and integrated way that supports learning. That, for their future, our students will need the creativity, critical thinking and problem-solving skills that working with technology now affords.

A great conference again this year, hosted by NHSTE and featuring keynote speakers Alan November, David Weinberger, and Dineen Frasier Bowen. All three speakers ran two sessions to follow-up their presentations – I like that about this conference.

Alan November started out by stating that we’re not preparing kids for a New Hampshire economy – we need to be preparing them for a global one, and that kids need to understand others’ points of view to work globally. That seems like such a far-reaching idea for an elementary teacher. But in roughly ten short years, our kids will be facing that scenario. It also struck me when he said technology has made kids equal to teachers as far as having, or being able to find, the information they need to learn. He thinks blogging is a good tool for writing since blog comments critique the work, and not the writer. He talked more about Web 2.0 tools – blogs, wikis, tools for collaboration. That teachers should be modeling for students the power of these tools as well as modeling appropriate tech behaviors. He told this great story about kids in a high school algebra class taking notes and posting them online for their peers – and having younger kids in the school access them and learn from them. One final note: November swears by AltaVista for searching! Also, I have his book – Empowering Students with Technology – if anyone wants to borrow it.

More about the other speakers soon……in the meantime, if you want to see the keynotes for yourself, they’re online at http://www.nhcmtc.org/2006/Keynote.html. Another thing I love about this conference.

This is an old movie (2001) but it’s still a good one. A little inspiration for your new year – may it be a great one!
When I become a teacher…

I’m a huge fan of Google. Their maps are the best, the calendar feature is wonderfully handy, and I love to check in on Google Labs periodically to see what the Google Folks are up to. Of course, Google is also an amazing search engine – for adults. But here’s another reason to reconsider using it with kids in school.

In an attempt to keep up with the popularity of sites like YouTube, Google is now letting users upload amateur video. Go to to the Google site and “Video” is simply displayed along with Web, Images, and all the other Google choices. But a click on “Video” leads the viewer to a page showing the opening frames of the most popular videos and their titles. And many of them are simply not for kids’ eyes. I tried changing Preferences (right next to the Google search box) in Google’s Safe Search to “strict filitering” but still, the same objectionable videos and titles appear.

The teacher in me constantly struggles with issues like this. Is it possible to teach kids to ignore this kind of content when there’s so much of it right there in front of them? Do we let it come their way, hoping they will make responsible choices? Or do we take steps to keep them from seeing it in the first place? And, if we do that, how do our students learn the discrimination skills they’ll need to have in place when no one is there to make the decisions for them? Any ideas?

Thanks to Steve Dembo at Teach42.com for blogging this to my attention. If you’re looking for a Google alternative to searching with kids, here’s the Reference & Research page I compiled last year. It’s a list of kid-friendly search engines and directories – perhaps not as good as Google, but certainly safer.