This entry has been sitting here in draft form since last fall. I haul it out every once in a while, revise it a little, then put it back in draft form. But tonight at the regional Title One conference, there was discussion about student bloggers that made this particular post again come to the forefront for me. Now I can’t stop thinking about it - which must mean it’s time to go public with it.

This year, in addition to Technocalities, I’ve maintained a personal blog. It started out as a place to post photos that I was trying to make myself take more of. But it quickly became a narrative of sorts - with a photo to accompany each entry. And two big surprises have come from it: I work harder at the writing part than I ever expected I would - and I actually look forward to doing it. How did that happen???

Usually I post late in the evening, just before the end of my day. Throughout the day, I think about an idea, a notion, the content of the day’s post. I find myself composing phrases at odd times. If I come up with something I really like, I often make a note to myself. I even started a running list of ideas about which to post - old stories and memories, things that are on my mind, that sort of thing. When I finally do sit down to blog, I have my dictionary application open so I can check spelling and reference the thesaurus. I compose the day’s post, then I reread and revise. Mull over my choices of words. Vary my sentence structure. Make sure the paragraph flows. Try to be concise but clear. I work hard on the ending trying for a big finish. When I think I’ve got it right, I publish - and then shut down for the night. But in the morning with coffee, after I’ve caught up on the news, after I’ve checked email and the weather, I read the post again. If it needs tweaking, I do it then. I find it helps in the revision process to have that little bit of distance from the original writing session.

Doesn’t this sound familiar??? Isn’t this precisely what we ask our kids to do when they write?

What is it that drives me to put so much effort into something as trivial as a photo blog? It’s because I know it’s being read. At this writing, I have a small audience. Very small, actually - but it’s an audience nonetheless. And, as I write, I am becoming more and more aware of the impact of my writing on this audience. I do believe I’m hooked. And I can not tell you how surprised I am by that.

So here’s my question: Could the same thing happen for kids who blog? Does it? Does their sense of audience drive them to work harder at writing than they ever thought they would? Might they find they actually like to write? I wonder.

chat.jpgThis weekend I read an article called New Approach To Online Safety Education which summarizes new research about kids who use social networking sites and their likelihood of internet victimization. The author, Larry Magid, has written about internet safety for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and hosts websites dealing with online safety for kids and teens. The research comes from several universities, including UNH.

In the past, safety measures have focused on the importance of not posting personal information like name, age, location, school, phone number, etc. While this is a good practice for children, the three studies cited suggest that this may not be the most important message for us to be relaying.

The data is consistent with other recent findings that have caused the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to no longer focus on “stranger danger” but rather the types of interactions that children are having with other people, including both strangers and acquaintances.

The types of interactions? The obviously risky ones like sex talk with someone met online. But also the less obvious - rude or nasty commenting and harassing or embarrasing others in a virtual setting. The kind of behavior we teachers don’t allow in school. The kind we trust parents don’t allow at home. Perhaps now the adult message needs to be stronger that these behaviors are unacceptable everywhere - including in the virtual world where we encourage anonymity and true identities can be hidden behind usernames and avatars.

This new research doesn’t mean we’ll change our message to kids about posting personal information. But even our young students chat - with each other as well as with unknown players in virtual settings. For their own safety, they need to learn to be as cautiously respectful online as they are off.

nature.jpgThis month’s issue of Orion Magazine has a thought-provoking article, Leave No Child Inside, about re-emphasizing the waning relationship between children and nature.

Studies of children in schoolyards with both green areas and manufactured play areas have found that children engaged in more creative forms of play in the green areas, and they also played more cooperatively. Recent research also shows a positive correlation between the length of children’s attention spans and direct experience in nature. Studies at the University of Illinois show that time in natural settings significantly reduces symptoms of attention-deficit (hyperactivity) disorder in children as young as age five. The research also shows the experience helps reduce negative stress and protects psychological well-being, especially in children undergoing the most stressful life events.

The article continues to outline obvious physical and physiological benefits to being outside, then launches into the not-so-obvious, cognitive ones that affect not just science skills, but also reading, math, and social studies. It states that studies show self-esteem, problem-solving, and motivation are all impacted by learning from nature. The author hints at a link between children’s stress levels and frequency of outdoor experiences. And to make a point, he relates a wonderful story about Ansel Adams as a young boy.

The article poses all sorts of questions. How does information like this relate to the testing movement of NCLB? What of children’s increasing use of technology in school and at home? Does the incidence of working families have an impact in this area? What are the implications for us in education? Do children’s interactions with nature or lack of it affect their future responsibility for the welfare of the Earth?

Reading this brought to mind childhood experiences outdoors that helped make me who I am. Many of us have memories like this. Will kids today have these memories too?

Regarding the video I posted a few days ago…

YouTube, the site where the video is located, is blocked by the district filter. So you’ll have to view it at home, I guess. The link is here.

This video was produced and posted by an associate professor at Kansas State. It contains timely, thought-provoking content dealing with the future of the web. Isn’t it ironic that we can’t view it in our own schools?

Web 2.0, the Read-Write web - call it what you like but know that it’s a huge topic these days. No longer is the web a static “read-only” presence. These days folks like you and me (and our kids) can easily post content to the web to contribute to what’s there. Think blogging and podcasting. Think YouTube, flickr, and del.icio.us. Granted, some of this content may not be worth every reader’s time - but that doesn’t impact on our right to post it. We are all authors, all contributors. Or we could be.

This past weekend, links to a short film posted to YouTube started floating around the blogosphere. It’s a well done piece about Web 2.0 - how the web as we know it is changing. Take a look.

asimov.jpgBorn today, Isaac Asimov (1920-1992) was a scientist, teacher, and writer. He must also have been a visionary - he wrote about computers and robots almost sixty years ago! Early in his career, he wrote science fiction and penned this short story for children for a newspaper in 1951. It was later published in Fantasy and Science Fiction Magazine. It’s a quick read - and it’s about education!

The Fun They Had
by Isaac Asimov

Margie even wrote about it that night in her diary. On the page headed 17 May, 2155, she wrote, ‘Today Tommy found a real book!’

It was a very old book. Margie’s grandfather once said that when he was a little boy his grandfather told him that there was a time when all stories were printed on paper.

They turned the pages, which were yellow and crinkly, and it was awfully funny to read words that stood still instead of moving the way they were supposed to— on a screen, you know. And then, when they turned back to the page before, it had the same words on it that it had had when they read it the first time.

‘Gee,’ said Tommy, ‘what a waste. When you’re through with the book, you just throw it away, I guess. Our television screen must have had a million books on it and it’s good for plenty more. I wouldn’t throw it away.’

‘Same with mine,’ said Margie. She was eleven and hadn’t seen as many telebooks as Tommy had. He was thirteen.

She said, ‘Where did you find it?’

‘In my house.’ He pointed without looking, because he was busy reading. ‘In the attic.’

‘What’s it about?’

‘School.’

Margie was scornful. ‘School? What’s there to write about school? I hate school.’ Margie always hated school, but now she hated it more than ever. The mechanical teacher had been giving her test after test in geography and she had been doing worse and worse until her mother had shaken her head sorrowfully and sent for the County Inspector.

He was a round little man with a red face and a whole box of tools with dials and wires. He smiled at her and gave her an apple, then took the teacher apart. Margie had hoped he wouldn’t know how to put it together again, but he knew how all right and after an hour or so, there it was again, large and black and ugly with a big screen on which all the lessons were shown and the questions were asked. That wasn’t so bad. The part she hated most was the slot where she had to put homework and test papers. She always had to write them out in a punch code they made her learn when she was six years old, and the mechanical teacher calculated the mark in no time.

The Inspector had smiled after he was finished and patted her head. He said to her mother. ‘It’s not the little girl’s fault, Mrs Jones. I think the geography sector a s geared a little too quick. Those things happen sometimes. I’ve slowed it up to an average ten-year level. Actually, the overall pattern of her progress is quite satisfactory.’ And he patted Margie’s head again.
Margie was disappointed. She had been hoping they would take the teacher away altogether. They had once taken Tommy’s teacher away for nearly a month because the history sector had blanked out completely.

So she said to Tommy, ‘Why would anyone write about school?’

Tommy looked at her with very superior eyes. ‘Because it’s not our kind of school, stupid. This is the old kind of school that they had hundreds and hundreds of years ago.’ He added loftily, pronouncing the word carefully, ‘Centuries ago.’
Margie was hurt. ‘Well, I don’t know what kind of school they had all that time ago.’ She read the book over his shoulder for a while, then said, ‘Anyway, they had a teacher.’

‘Sure they had a teacher, but it wasn’t a regular teacher. It was a man.’

‘A man ? How could a man be a teacher?’

‘Well, he just told the boys and girls things and gave them homework and asked them questions.’

‘A man isn’t smart enough.’

‘Sure he is. My father knows as much as my teacher.’

‘He can’t. A man can’t know as much as a teacher.’

‘He knows almost as much I betcha.’

Margie wasn’t prepared to dispute that. She said. ‘I wouldn’t want a strange man in my house to teach me.’

Tommy screamed with laughter, ‘You don’t know much, Margie. The teachers didn’t live in the house. They had a special building and all the kids went there.’

‘And all the kids learned the same thing?’

‘Sure, if they were the same age.’

‘But my mother says a teacher has to be adjusted to fit the mind of each boy and girl it teaches and that each kid has to be taught differently.’

‘Just the same they didn’t do it that way tben. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to read the book.’

‘I didn’t say I didn’t like it,’ Margie said quickly. She wanted to read about those funny schools.

They weren’t even half finished when Margie’s mother called, ‘Margie! School!’

Margie looked up. ‘Not yet, mamma.’

‘Now: said Mrs. Jones. ‘And it’s probably time for Tommy, too.’

Margie said to Tommy, ‘Can I read the book some more with you after school?’

‘Maybe,’ he said, nonchalantly. He walked away whistling, the dusty old book tucked beneath his arm.

Margie went into the schoolroom. It was right next to her bedroom, and the mechanical teacher was on and waiting for her. It was always on at the same time every day except Saturday and Sunday, because her mother said little girls learned better if they learned at regular hours.

The screen was lit up, and it said: ‘Today’s arithmetic lesson is on the addition of proper fractions. Please insert yesterday’s homework in the proper slot.’

Margie did so with a sigh. She was thinking about the old schools they had when her grandfather’s grandfather was a little boy. All the kids from the whole neighbourhood came, laughing and shouting in the school-yard, sitting together in the schoolroom, going home together at the end of the day. They learned the same things so they could help one another on the home-work and talk about it.

And the teachers were people…

The mechanical teacher was flashing on the screen: ‘When we add the fractions 1/2 and 1/4 —’

Margie was thinking about how the kids must have loved it in the old days. She was thinking about the fun they had.

(Thanks to Pete at EdTech Journeys for posting this on Christmas!)

midnight180.jpgIt’s that time of year again - time to be thinking about ways to make the new year easier or better or more productive than the last. If I write ‘em down, I might just achieve these goals - here’s what I plan to do differently in 2007 with regard to technology.

  • Name files better. I should be more consistent and concise in creating and naming files to save. Word automatically picks up the beginning of the first sentence in a new document and will name the file with that by default - like this: It was a dark and stormy night when John first arrived at Newfound.doc. A better file name might be dark_stormy.doc - no spaces between words, no punctuation (except .doc), and just long enough to remind me of the contents of the file. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen documentation on the correct way to name files and, if it exists, please post a link for us. What I do know is that I’ve seen files that couldn’t be opened miraculously open up when odd file names are changed. I also believe Unix, which is what Macs run in the background, can be a bit fussy when it comes to file names. So I’m not taking any chances. I must be getting better with this already - the other day I labeled a Tupperware container of leftover chicken broth like this: c_broth-dec06.
  • Maintain my inbox. When I was in the classroom, I had to hide my desk. Too much clutter. Eventually I got rid of it entirely and turned it into our science center. My inbox is the new reincarnation of that desk - a holding tank for all the info I don’t have time to deal with or to file or to get rid of. At last count I had 2000+ emails, which is inexcusable, and 41 folders, which has been my valiant attempt at organization. I plan to take the time daily to sift through my emails, filing what I need, deleting what I don’t, and responding back, in a timely manner, to those I need to. Email has become a way of life at Newfound. It’s time I changed my habits to deal with it effectively and efficiently.
  • Pay attention to storage. As you can no doubt infer by now, I like to be able to see my stuff. Sadly my computer desktop reflects that. Folders of current projects or documents in process sit on the desktop where I can see them. Where I can get to them easily when I need them - because I’m going to need them soon! But, as a result, they don’t get backed up with the rest of the stuff hidden away in my Documents folder. Documents folders on the servers in each building are backed up every day. Choosing ease of file retrieval over ease of backup is just plain not a good choice - especially for someone in my position. This will be a tough one for me since I have Documents folders in each school. But I resolve to use them for their intended purpose - to keep all my stuff safe.
  • Investigate new programs. I’m a hands-on learner. The only way I learn something new is to mess around with it, make mistakes, then learn from them. And there are so many new (and old - and FREE!) applications that I want to learn, ones that have clear implications for education. But who has the time? I sure don’t! I’m resolving this year to make time to fool around with at least a couple of them. New programs come out all the time. If I don’t keep up, I’m just going to get lost in a sea of new educational technologies about which I know only the names.
  • Schedule reading. There are so many good edtech blogs out there, so many online versions of print educational magazines. So many opportunities to learn from others. And I never, ever have enough time to read it all. How do I know what’s going on outside my own walls if I don’t read? So, in an effort to keep up, I’m going to try to schedule the same hour every week, just to read. Is an hour enough? Probably not. Will I finish it all in 60 minutes? Not likely. But at least I’ll be further along in my professional reading than I have been this year.

That’s it. I think I’ve made a manageable list. I’m at least going to give it a try. How about you? What will you do differently in 2007?

Happy New Year!

For the second time in as many weeks, mainstream media has again hit the nail on the head. TIME magazine has named its 2006 Person of the Year - and it’s YOU. The award is based on our collective ability and willingness to interact, collaborate, and learn from and with each other on a global scale using the tools of Web 2.0. The podcasts and the videos, the social networking tools, the blogs and wikis and mashups. It’s “about community and collaboration on a scale never seen before” and about the energy and passion that drives millions of us to take - make - the time to be a part of it.

It’s about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes … We’re looking at an explosion of productivity and innovation, and it’s just getting started, as millions of minds that would otherwise have drowned in obscurity get backhauled into the global intellectual economy.

It’s this movement that TIME has deemed as having most influenced the events of this year. So congratulations to YOU! Now, what are the implications of this on the future of YOUR students?

A few hours ago, the Boston Red Sox organization presented their new right hander, Daisuke Matsuzaka, at a news conference at Fenway. As I watched the footage online, I had questions and wanted to know more. On the pages of Wikipedia, I quickly read about Matsuzaka’s high school experience, his early baseball career, the 2004 Olympics, and the recent details surrounding his acquisition by the Red Sox. There was even information about tonight’s press conference, right there on the pages of Wikipedia.

wiki400.jpg

The article is heavily footnoted with citations to content in the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, ESPN, Yahoo Sports and japanball.com. There are facts stated with requests in blue asking for someone to post the citation. There’s a disclaimer stating that the article is a current sports-related event and the content may change rapidly. The reader is made aware of possible discrepancies in the article.

Yes, Wikipedia can be written to by anyone. And yes, anyone can edit what’s there. But are there instances where that’s a postive rather than a negative? Are there times when Wikipedia is the best place to look for information?

Red Sox fans will no doubt monitor the article’s content and tweak it if needed. They’ll edit out misinformation if it appears. This is the beauty of Wikipedia - collective collaboration centered around a point of mutual interest to disseminate the facts. Can Encyclopedia Britannica do that?

Interesting article about the nation’s schools in this week’s TIME magazine: How to Bring Our Schools Out of the 20th Century.

For the past five years, the national conversation on education has focused on reading scores, math tests and closing the “achievement gap” between social classes. This is not a story about that conversation. This is a story about the big public conversation the nation is not having about education, the one that will ultimately determine not merely whether some fraction of our children get “left behind” but also whether an entire generation of kids will fail to make the grade in the global economy because they can’t think their way through abstract problems, work in teams, distinguish good information from bad or speak a language other than English.

Many edtech bloggers have long been posting along these lines. The flattening World. Preparation for a global economy. Thinking outside the box. Creativity. Now these ideas are showing up in mainstream media. Will the message be more emphatic now that TIME says it?

Next Page »